![Superspeed supercache alternatives](https://sign.faraton.info/22.png)
![superspeed supercache alternatives superspeed supercache alternatives](https://www.saashub.com/images/app/screenshots/48/5d8e70e82be4/landing-medium.jpg)
Allegations of Infringement The SuperSpeed patents relate to a method and system for caching I/O devices across a network embodied in a software product known as "SuperCache V1.3-01 through V2.1-27."1 SuperSpeed alleges that Google infringes thirteen claims from the two patents: For the reasons stated below, Google's motion for summary judgment will be denied as to invalidity and granted as to non-infringement and willful infringement, SuperSpeed's motion to strike and Google's motion to exclude will both be denied as moot. 163), and Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment in Support of Invalidity, Non-Infringement, and No Willful Infringement (Docket Entry No. 160), Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion to Exclude Testimony of SuperSpeed, LLC's Expert Robert Mills (Docket Entry No. Pending before the court are SuperSpeed's Motion to Strike Portions of Kubiatowicz Expert Report Referring to Undisclosed Invalidity Allegations (Docket Entry No. The '226 Patent is the parent application to the '244 Patent, and both patents claim priority to U.S. ( "Google" ), involving United States Patent Nos.
![superspeed supercache alternatives superspeed supercache alternatives](https://cdn4.geckoandfly.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ultra-ramdisk-pro.jpg)
H-12-1688 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This is a patent infringement suit filed by SuperSpeed, L.L.C. 204 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SUPERS PEED, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. Google Corporation of Mountain View, California Doc.
![Superspeed supercache alternatives](https://sign.faraton.info/22.png)